Read E-mail warning Prime Minister Harper More Would Die If Canada Did not Settle Lawsuit
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and
The WaterWarCrimes Files
Prime Minister Stephen Harper was first introduced to the WaterWarCrimes files on October 8, 2005 in Vancouver when he was handed a copy of the Second Police Report that implicated several of Paul Martin's Cabinet Ministers in serious criminal activity. He was advised the Report could put Ujjal Dosanjh, Stephen Owen and Anne McLellan in jail. Mr. Harper took the Report and on November 28, 2005 was able to use the document to persuade NDP leader Jack Layton and Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe to support a motion of non-confidence against the government of Prime Minister Paul Martin.
An election was held and Stephen Harper was elected with a minority government.
An election was held and Stephen Harper was elected with a minority government.
Prominent Conservatives Linked To The WaterWarCrimes
The failure of Stephen Harper to address the issues in the WaterWarCrimes lawsuit may arise from the fact that several prominent members of the Federal Conservative Party were linked to the bulk water export issues and W.C.W. Western Canada Water Enterprises Ltd., the company that received the illegal favours from the British Columbia government.
Click on the PICTURE for a brief comment about the role of these prominent members of the Conservative Party in the WaterWarCrimes.
John Reynolds Lyall Knott Fred Doucet Brian Mulroney David Emerson
Click on the PICTURE for a brief comment about the role of these prominent members of the Conservative Party in the WaterWarCrimes.
John Reynolds Lyall Knott Fred Doucet Brian Mulroney David Emerson
Canada US Free Trade Agreement and Water
When the Canada US Free Trade Agreement was negotiated there was some controversy about whether or not water was included in the agreement. The implementation legislation, in Canada, excludes water in its natural free-flowing state. The legislation is silent on water in other conditions, such as water in a tanker truck, a supertanker, a pipeline, a fifty litre keg, or in an aqua-duct. It is a valid legal interpretation that the specific exclusion of water in its free flowing state from the provisions of the FTA means that water in its other states - non-free flowing - was intended to be covered by the FTA.
There has been a lot of nonsense spouted in Canada's media about water not being covered by NAFTA because Canada has not yet exported water and that if Canada exports water then NAFTA would apply and Canada could not stop the export of water legally. This is untrue.
The fact is that water, as a good or commodity, in bulk, is traded across the Canada US border and has been traded across that border for decades, by pipeline, tanker truck, and other containers.
The British Columbia government enacted legislation, in 1996, that attempts to restrict the export of water to the USA in containers 5 litres or smaller. The British Columbia Government's own legal advice at the time was that such legislation was probably illegal and would not likely survive a trade law challenge.
Environmentally, it makes no difference to the environmental health of a stream or river if the water is exported in supertankers or in five litre containters. It makes no difference to the environmental health of a stream or river if the water is exported to Seattle and Chicago or to Vancouver and Montreal.
There has been a lot of nonsense spouted in Canada's media about water not being covered by NAFTA because Canada has not yet exported water and that if Canada exports water then NAFTA would apply and Canada could not stop the export of water legally. This is untrue.
The fact is that water, as a good or commodity, in bulk, is traded across the Canada US border and has been traded across that border for decades, by pipeline, tanker truck, and other containers.
The British Columbia government enacted legislation, in 1996, that attempts to restrict the export of water to the USA in containers 5 litres or smaller. The British Columbia Government's own legal advice at the time was that such legislation was probably illegal and would not likely survive a trade law challenge.
Environmentally, it makes no difference to the environmental health of a stream or river if the water is exported in supertankers or in five litre containters. It makes no difference to the environmental health of a stream or river if the water is exported to Seattle and Chicago or to Vancouver and Montreal.
Canada's Deputy Minister of Justice John Sims, Q.C.
John Sims Q.C.
After enduring much abuse at the hands of the crooked governments of Jean Chretien, Paul Martin, Glen Clark, Ujjal Dosanjh and Gordon Campbell, Mr Carten and Ms. Gibbs welcomed the election of a seemingly honest politician like Stephen Harper and they wrote to his Deputy Minister of Justice, John Sims, Q.C., to open a negotiation to work out an appropriate compensation package because their rights had been so obviously trammeled by the Government of Canada under the previous regime.
Mr. Sims wrote back suggesting they deal directly with Canada's Corporate Counsel Deborah MacNair. After some months of correspondence, it became obvious that MacNair had instruction to do nothing and that John Sims Q.C. had been playing a deceitful game by referring them to her. John Sims was to prove his duplicitous nature again when he signed a clearly fraudulent submission that was filed in Action T-95-08 in Canada's Federal Court in May 2008. This fraud by John Sims was properly brought to the attention of Mr. Robert Lafreniere who, instead of rejecting the submission, adopted the fraud and dismissed the lawsuit.
Enough is enough.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Justice Minister Rob Nicholson were duly alerted to the fraud by Mr. Sims and, on Christmas Day, 2009, the details of the fraud by John Sims Q.C. the Deputy Minister of Justice for Canada were delivered by e-mail to every member of Canada's Senate and House of Commons.
On Monday December 28, 2009, Prime Minister Stephen Harper showed up at work and was probably alerted to the fact that anyone of the 301 member in the House of Commons or 105 member Senate of Canada could take the information in the e-mail, go public, and destroy the career of his Minister of Justice, the Honorable Rob Nicholson and, possibly, topple his minority government.
On Wednesday December 30, 2009, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced that he was suspending or proroguing Canada's Parliament until March 3, 2010.
Mr. Sims wrote back suggesting they deal directly with Canada's Corporate Counsel Deborah MacNair. After some months of correspondence, it became obvious that MacNair had instruction to do nothing and that John Sims Q.C. had been playing a deceitful game by referring them to her. John Sims was to prove his duplicitous nature again when he signed a clearly fraudulent submission that was filed in Action T-95-08 in Canada's Federal Court in May 2008. This fraud by John Sims was properly brought to the attention of Mr. Robert Lafreniere who, instead of rejecting the submission, adopted the fraud and dismissed the lawsuit.
Enough is enough.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Justice Minister Rob Nicholson were duly alerted to the fraud by Mr. Sims and, on Christmas Day, 2009, the details of the fraud by John Sims Q.C. the Deputy Minister of Justice for Canada were delivered by e-mail to every member of Canada's Senate and House of Commons.
On Monday December 28, 2009, Prime Minister Stephen Harper showed up at work and was probably alerted to the fact that anyone of the 301 member in the House of Commons or 105 member Senate of Canada could take the information in the e-mail, go public, and destroy the career of his Minister of Justice, the Honorable Rob Nicholson and, possibly, topple his minority government.
On Wednesday December 30, 2009, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced that he was suspending or proroguing Canada's Parliament until March 3, 2010.
