February 25, 2008: Wrongful Arrest and Detention In Kelowna
On February 25, 2008, Mr. Carten, who was blowing the whistle on government corruption was arrested at the Kelowna courthouse (shown to the left) by three armed sheriffs on a charge of criminal harassment as he was leaving a courtroom. He was handcuffed, put in a police wagon, and held in the cells for 6 hours. Apparently, the judge became annoyed that Mr. Carten was accompanied by Ms. Gibbs who whispered something to Mr. Carten and the judge asked who I was and why I was there. Ms. Gibbs was then horrified when she opened the door to the little room to find the sheriffs waiting outside after the telephone hearing was finished. She was asked to step aside and they handcuffed Mr. Carten. Ms. Gibbs stood in terror seeing Mr. Carten hauled off to jail for no reason.
Was Chief Judge Hugh Stansfield The Mastermind Behind the Charge?
The charge of criminal harassment was laid by a member of the Victoria City Police Department acting on false information provided by British Columbia lawyer Brenda Edwards, the legal assistant to the Chief Judge of the Provincial Court of British Columbia Mr. Hugh Stansfield (deceased).
Mr. Stansfield had allegedly been involved in serious crimes while on the bench that had been the subject of investigations of private investigator, Rob Nicholson, who advised that, according to his sources, Hugh Stansfield was a major pedophile who was regularly supplied by organized crime individuals with children as young as six to satisfy his perversions. This information was well known to BC lawyer Karl Eisbrenner who was summarily disbarred by the BC Law Society, in 2002, and who shared his concerns with Mr. Carten before his death in a suspicious car accident in 2006. In addition, Mr. Carten knew from investigator, Derek Bawn, and Dr. David Kuntz that Mr. Stansfield had played a role a major medical insurance fraud prior to his appointment to the bench. Co-incidentally, this medical insurance fraud involved the law firms of McCarthy Tetrault, that was on retainer to Mr. Stansfield as Chief Judge. It is possible that Mr. Stansfield or his handlers at McCarthy Tetrault viewed Mr. Carten as a threat and told his assistant to lie to the police.
The information about Chief Judge Stansfield's sexual alleged perversion, a heinous crime, is that at exactly the time documents were being sent back and forth over the internet that would have proved such allegations were true, Mr. Stansfield dropped dead, allegedly firm cancer on May 7, 2009, although he was seen to be in excellent health on April 25, 2009 only two weeks prior. Well, everybody knows that nobody who looks healthy and well suddenly drops dead from cancer because cancer is a slow killer that takes months or years to kill. This event is consistent with the on-going e-mail monitoring of Mr. Carten and Mr. Nicholson and a few other citizens by the local authorities. Curiously, about the same time CSIS director, Jim Judd, and Clerk of the Privy Council, Kevin Lynch, announced they were leaving their jobs. It is assumed that the "watchers" were reviewing what was being sent over the internet and knowing Judge Stansfield was a liability decided to take measures to eliminate him before he became a problem. Mr. Judd and Mr. Lynch were long time career civil servants who know how control is exercised and can be presumed to have known about Stansfield's psychological issues but turned a blind eye because Stansfield was useful to them. All of this e-mail correspondence is now filed in the Federal Court Action T-95-08 and tends to prove that Hugh Stansfield was an agent of the Government of Canada.
The allegations about Chief Judge Hugh Stansfield should not take anyone by surprise. British Columbia has some serious sexual perversion problems among its civil service who have repeatedly been caught in child prostitution, child porn, and child sex abuse operations on a major scale. There have been persistent rumours and allegations that a pedophile ring has been operating for several years among some members of the judiciary. Naturally, like the various Church's caught in similar allegations, the British Columbia Government does everything it can to conceal these matters.
Mr. Stansfield had allegedly been involved in serious crimes while on the bench that had been the subject of investigations of private investigator, Rob Nicholson, who advised that, according to his sources, Hugh Stansfield was a major pedophile who was regularly supplied by organized crime individuals with children as young as six to satisfy his perversions. This information was well known to BC lawyer Karl Eisbrenner who was summarily disbarred by the BC Law Society, in 2002, and who shared his concerns with Mr. Carten before his death in a suspicious car accident in 2006. In addition, Mr. Carten knew from investigator, Derek Bawn, and Dr. David Kuntz that Mr. Stansfield had played a role a major medical insurance fraud prior to his appointment to the bench. Co-incidentally, this medical insurance fraud involved the law firms of McCarthy Tetrault, that was on retainer to Mr. Stansfield as Chief Judge. It is possible that Mr. Stansfield or his handlers at McCarthy Tetrault viewed Mr. Carten as a threat and told his assistant to lie to the police.
The information about Chief Judge Stansfield's sexual alleged perversion, a heinous crime, is that at exactly the time documents were being sent back and forth over the internet that would have proved such allegations were true, Mr. Stansfield dropped dead, allegedly firm cancer on May 7, 2009, although he was seen to be in excellent health on April 25, 2009 only two weeks prior. Well, everybody knows that nobody who looks healthy and well suddenly drops dead from cancer because cancer is a slow killer that takes months or years to kill. This event is consistent with the on-going e-mail monitoring of Mr. Carten and Mr. Nicholson and a few other citizens by the local authorities. Curiously, about the same time CSIS director, Jim Judd, and Clerk of the Privy Council, Kevin Lynch, announced they were leaving their jobs. It is assumed that the "watchers" were reviewing what was being sent over the internet and knowing Judge Stansfield was a liability decided to take measures to eliminate him before he became a problem. Mr. Judd and Mr. Lynch were long time career civil servants who know how control is exercised and can be presumed to have known about Stansfield's psychological issues but turned a blind eye because Stansfield was useful to them. All of this e-mail correspondence is now filed in the Federal Court Action T-95-08 and tends to prove that Hugh Stansfield was an agent of the Government of Canada.
The allegations about Chief Judge Hugh Stansfield should not take anyone by surprise. British Columbia has some serious sexual perversion problems among its civil service who have repeatedly been caught in child prostitution, child porn, and child sex abuse operations on a major scale. There have been persistent rumours and allegations that a pedophile ring has been operating for several years among some members of the judiciary. Naturally, like the various Church's caught in similar allegations, the British Columbia Government does everything it can to conceal these matters.
The Chief Prosecutors:
Robert Gillen (B.C.),
John Sims (Can),
Wally Oppal (BC), and
Rob Nicholson (Can)
Robert Gillen was the Assistant Deputy Minister was the man in charge of criminal prosecutions when the charge was brought agaisnt Mr. Carten. When first line prosecutor, the man in the courtroom, Mr. Tim Stokes, refused to dislcose relevant documents, Mr. Carten wrote to Robert Gillen and Canada's Deputy Minister of Justice, John Sims Q.C., requesting that they honour Mr. Carten's supposedly guaranteed right to full and fair disclosure of relevant documents guaranteed by the Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The two chief bureaucrats refused to respond to Mr. Carten's reasonable request and the railroading of Mr. Carten was in motion. In Canada, when the Government wants to screw a citizen, the citizen has no rights.
The soviet style prosecution was seeking a psychiatric assessment of Mr. Carten and, just by co-incidence, Mr. Gillen was on the board of directors of the Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia. In Canada, the state has a history of using crooked psychiatrists to silence lawyers.
Click here to read about the Dr. Kline and the pycho legal mafia.
Click here to read how Dr. Jeanette Smith destroyed BC lawyer Karl Eisbrenner.
Co-incidentally, Assistant Deputy Attorney General, Robert Gillen, like his colleague, former Deputy Attorney General, but now Deputy Minister to the Premier, Allan Seckel, spends his spare time coaching a teenage girls sports team - a matter that the psychiatrists may find worthy of examination.
The soviet style prosecution was a retaliation against BC lawyer, John F. Carten because he had continued to blow the whistle on the WaterWarCrimes that the Governments of Canada and British Columbia were trying to conceal.
The prosecution was controlled from the very top and paints a picture of totalitarianism in Canada.
Robert Gillen John Sims Wally Oppal Rob Nicholson
Click on picture for more information
The soviet style prosecution was seeking a psychiatric assessment of Mr. Carten and, just by co-incidence, Mr. Gillen was on the board of directors of the Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia. In Canada, the state has a history of using crooked psychiatrists to silence lawyers.
Click here to read about the Dr. Kline and the pycho legal mafia.
Click here to read how Dr. Jeanette Smith destroyed BC lawyer Karl Eisbrenner.
Co-incidentally, Assistant Deputy Attorney General, Robert Gillen, like his colleague, former Deputy Attorney General, but now Deputy Minister to the Premier, Allan Seckel, spends his spare time coaching a teenage girls sports team - a matter that the psychiatrists may find worthy of examination.
The soviet style prosecution was a retaliation against BC lawyer, John F. Carten because he had continued to blow the whistle on the WaterWarCrimes that the Governments of Canada and British Columbia were trying to conceal.
The prosecution was controlled from the very top and paints a picture of totalitarianism in Canada.
Robert Gillen John Sims Wally Oppal Rob Nicholson
Click on picture for more information
    |
In May be another co-incidence, but, it looks like these four gentlemen, US Senator John McCain,Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister, David Emerson, BC Supreme Court Justice, Peter Leask, and US Senator Lindsey Graham are connected to the undoing of the attempting railroading and malicious prosecution of Canadian lawyer, John Carten, by the Canadian and British Columbia governments.
Click here to read about the mystery visit to Canada of US Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham |
The Malicious Prosecution of Canadian Lawyer John Carten by Canada's Governments Is under Construction
The attack on Mr. Carten was the most preposterous criminal prosecution in the history of the world and was a veiled attempt to railroad Mr. Carten into a psychiatric hospital where could be subjected to the forced medication, discredited by a fraudster psychiatrist and, possibly, murdered.
These tactics have been employed against others, including some lawyers, who, like Mr. Carten, have blown the whistle on corruption in British Columbia.
Mr. Carten was charged with criminal harassment, under section 264 of the Criminal Code of Canada, because he encouraged the former Assistaint Deputy Minister to the crooked Premier Glen Clark, and to the then legal assistant to Chief Judge Hugh Stansfield, to co-operate with an police investigation then being carried out by the Victoria City Police into the documented allegations that employees of the Government of British Columbia,William Pearce, Timothy Leadem, Richard Meyer, Gillian Wallace, Anne Wilson, Lisa Shendroff, Don Chaisson, Stephen Owen and others, that had committed the crimes of fraud, perjury and obstruction of justice in order to block or obstruct the lawsuit initiated by Sun Belt Water, Inc. in the Canadian courts.
The complainant was went to the police and lied about Mr. Carten. The police, obviously played along and, instead of asking the complainant about the crimes the complainant was alleged to have committed in 1998, the police completed a form known in Canada as “an Information” which formally commenced the prosecution process.
The legal process had been turned upside down.
The government prosecutors were notified that the complainant lied to the police and the lies were easily proved by the documentary record but the government prosecutors continued the case against Mr. Carten.
When a key witness, called by the government prosecutors, Mr. Craig Jones, proved the complainant to be a liar and the case against Mr. Carten was thrown out by Mr. Justice Peter Leask.
Instead of giving up and leaving Mr. Carten alone, the government prosecutors filed an appeal and hoped to continue the case against Mr. Carten. The appeal was only stayed when Mr. Carten made it known, he would be seeking full disclosure of all documentation that would prove the Government of British Columbia has participated in a criminal conspiracy against Sun Belt Water Inc and that the Attorney General and the complainant had been parties.
The tactics used by the Government of British Columbia against Mr. Carten prove the malicious nature of the prosecution.
1. Mr. Carten has absolutely no record of violence but he was summarily arrested put in handcuffs and taken directly to the cells when was leaving a courtroom in the courthouse in Kelowna, British Columbia.
2. The terms of bail were artfully devised and included a provision to prevent Mr. Carten from visiting Vancouver Island where the trial was going to take place except for scheduled court appearances. This term was clearly intended to make it practically impossible for Mr. Carten to retain retaining and instruct legal counsel on Vancouver Island where the trial was going to take place. All communication with a Victoria based lawyer would have to be by telephone or email and those communication lines were already monitored by the Government.
3, The Governments of Canada and British Columbia refused to disclose any of the documents in their files that would prove that the complainant had been involved in a fraud in 1998 and that her complaint was part of a conspiracy to was discredit Mr. Carten who was blowing the whistle on a crime she had participated in. These documents would have been useful to discredit the testimony of the complainant.
Fortunately, something happened inside the Canadian government in late June 2008 and, in early July, 2008, Mr. Justice Peter Leask, of the Supreme Court of British Columbia was assigned to take over the case against Mr. Carten from the Provincial Court of British Columbia judge who was assigned to the case.
The assignment of Justice Peter Leask to the case marked a big change.
No longer was the assisted trial judge the handpicked friend of Provincial Court Chief Judge Hugh Stansfield, the complainant's boss who was, in turn, handpicked for his job by British Columbia Premier, Gordon Campbell and his Attorney General who have been concealing major crime by British Columbia government insiders since they were elected to office.
Justice Peter Leask had had a career as a criminal defense counsel in Vancouver. He knew the dirty tricks that British Columbia prosecutors can play. British Columbia prosecutors have a sorry international reputation reputation for lying, cheating, holding back evidence and otherwise fixing cases.
Mr. Justice Leask was appointed to his position by the Canada's federal government and does not take instructions from the provincial government of British Columbia.
Immediately after Mr. Justice Leask was appointed to the case, Mr. Carten made application for disclosure of documents which was granted by the court and and the government lawyers immediately tried to get Mr. Justice Leask to get off the case but the judge held his ground and the case went forward leading to a brief trial where the complainant was proved to have exaggerated the evidence, i.e. lied, and the case against Mr. Carten was dismissed..
The case against Mr. Carten was nothing more than a fabrication to try to discredit Mr. Carten by railroading him into jail and subjecting him to a fraudulent psychiatric assessment carried.
These tactics have been employed against others, including some lawyers, who, like Mr. Carten, have blown the whistle on corruption in British Columbia.
Mr. Carten was charged with criminal harassment, under section 264 of the Criminal Code of Canada, because he encouraged the former Assistaint Deputy Minister to the crooked Premier Glen Clark, and to the then legal assistant to Chief Judge Hugh Stansfield, to co-operate with an police investigation then being carried out by the Victoria City Police into the documented allegations that employees of the Government of British Columbia,William Pearce, Timothy Leadem, Richard Meyer, Gillian Wallace, Anne Wilson, Lisa Shendroff, Don Chaisson, Stephen Owen and others, that had committed the crimes of fraud, perjury and obstruction of justice in order to block or obstruct the lawsuit initiated by Sun Belt Water, Inc. in the Canadian courts.
The complainant was went to the police and lied about Mr. Carten. The police, obviously played along and, instead of asking the complainant about the crimes the complainant was alleged to have committed in 1998, the police completed a form known in Canada as “an Information” which formally commenced the prosecution process.
The legal process had been turned upside down.
The government prosecutors were notified that the complainant lied to the police and the lies were easily proved by the documentary record but the government prosecutors continued the case against Mr. Carten.
When a key witness, called by the government prosecutors, Mr. Craig Jones, proved the complainant to be a liar and the case against Mr. Carten was thrown out by Mr. Justice Peter Leask.
Instead of giving up and leaving Mr. Carten alone, the government prosecutors filed an appeal and hoped to continue the case against Mr. Carten. The appeal was only stayed when Mr. Carten made it known, he would be seeking full disclosure of all documentation that would prove the Government of British Columbia has participated in a criminal conspiracy against Sun Belt Water Inc and that the Attorney General and the complainant had been parties.
The tactics used by the Government of British Columbia against Mr. Carten prove the malicious nature of the prosecution.
1. Mr. Carten has absolutely no record of violence but he was summarily arrested put in handcuffs and taken directly to the cells when was leaving a courtroom in the courthouse in Kelowna, British Columbia.
2. The terms of bail were artfully devised and included a provision to prevent Mr. Carten from visiting Vancouver Island where the trial was going to take place except for scheduled court appearances. This term was clearly intended to make it practically impossible for Mr. Carten to retain retaining and instruct legal counsel on Vancouver Island where the trial was going to take place. All communication with a Victoria based lawyer would have to be by telephone or email and those communication lines were already monitored by the Government.
3, The Governments of Canada and British Columbia refused to disclose any of the documents in their files that would prove that the complainant had been involved in a fraud in 1998 and that her complaint was part of a conspiracy to was discredit Mr. Carten who was blowing the whistle on a crime she had participated in. These documents would have been useful to discredit the testimony of the complainant.
Fortunately, something happened inside the Canadian government in late June 2008 and, in early July, 2008, Mr. Justice Peter Leask, of the Supreme Court of British Columbia was assigned to take over the case against Mr. Carten from the Provincial Court of British Columbia judge who was assigned to the case.
The assignment of Justice Peter Leask to the case marked a big change.
No longer was the assisted trial judge the handpicked friend of Provincial Court Chief Judge Hugh Stansfield, the complainant's boss who was, in turn, handpicked for his job by British Columbia Premier, Gordon Campbell and his Attorney General who have been concealing major crime by British Columbia government insiders since they were elected to office.
Justice Peter Leask had had a career as a criminal defense counsel in Vancouver. He knew the dirty tricks that British Columbia prosecutors can play. British Columbia prosecutors have a sorry international reputation reputation for lying, cheating, holding back evidence and otherwise fixing cases.
Mr. Justice Leask was appointed to his position by the Canada's federal government and does not take instructions from the provincial government of British Columbia.
Immediately after Mr. Justice Leask was appointed to the case, Mr. Carten made application for disclosure of documents which was granted by the court and and the government lawyers immediately tried to get Mr. Justice Leask to get off the case but the judge held his ground and the case went forward leading to a brief trial where the complainant was proved to have exaggerated the evidence, i.e. lied, and the case against Mr. Carten was dismissed..
The case against Mr. Carten was nothing more than a fabrication to try to discredit Mr. Carten by railroading him into jail and subjecting him to a fraudulent psychiatric assessment carried.
