Canadian Judicial Council Commits Fraud
The Canadian Judicial Council is one of the greatest impediments to reform of Canada's justice system.
The Council was set up by Canada's first self-admitted Communist Prime Minister, Pierre Trudeau, and has successfully protected the network of criminals operating inside Canada's justice system that is heavily involved in the production of child pornography, human trafficking of children for sexual and Satanic purposes, money laundering and much more. Trudeau himself was a well known bi-sexual but insiders report that he was also a child-molestor who enjoyed sex with young children.
In the Water War Crimes case the Canadian Judicial Council proved itself to be a corrupt institution in the first week of February 2000 by lying and misleading the public about the complaints and investigations that were filed concerning Mr. Bryan Williams, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, in the months prior to his resignation on February 5, 2000 a mere five years after he was appointed to his position by Canada's Prime Minister Jean Chretien.
These complaints were filed because Chief Justice WIlliams was making out of court attempts to block investigations being carried out by legal counsel for Sun Belt Water Inc. and because somebody was obviously manipulating the assignment of the judiciary to the Sun Belt Water Inc lawsuit, a matter that usually falls within the responsibility of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
The Executive Director for the Canadian Judicial Council, Jeannie Thomas, and senior member of the Council British Columbia Chief Justice Allan McEachern flat out lied to the media and denied there had been any complaints filed or that there was any investigation.
When Ms. Thomas and Mr. McEachern refused to retract their lies, Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin, the Chairperson of the Canadian Judicial Council, was contacted and asked to correct the fraud on the public record in Canada a matter she refused to do.
Ms. McLachlin was appointed Chief Justice of Canada and Chairperson of the Canadian Judicial Council by Prime Minister Jean Chretien effective January 1, 2000 upon the resignation of Chief Justice Antonio Lamer who retired 11 yers early after he was caught covering up for the other crooked judges in the Water War Crimes saga.
The Council was set up by Canada's first self-admitted Communist Prime Minister, Pierre Trudeau, and has successfully protected the network of criminals operating inside Canada's justice system that is heavily involved in the production of child pornography, human trafficking of children for sexual and Satanic purposes, money laundering and much more. Trudeau himself was a well known bi-sexual but insiders report that he was also a child-molestor who enjoyed sex with young children.
In the Water War Crimes case the Canadian Judicial Council proved itself to be a corrupt institution in the first week of February 2000 by lying and misleading the public about the complaints and investigations that were filed concerning Mr. Bryan Williams, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, in the months prior to his resignation on February 5, 2000 a mere five years after he was appointed to his position by Canada's Prime Minister Jean Chretien.
These complaints were filed because Chief Justice WIlliams was making out of court attempts to block investigations being carried out by legal counsel for Sun Belt Water Inc. and because somebody was obviously manipulating the assignment of the judiciary to the Sun Belt Water Inc lawsuit, a matter that usually falls within the responsibility of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
The Executive Director for the Canadian Judicial Council, Jeannie Thomas, and senior member of the Council British Columbia Chief Justice Allan McEachern flat out lied to the media and denied there had been any complaints filed or that there was any investigation.
When Ms. Thomas and Mr. McEachern refused to retract their lies, Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin, the Chairperson of the Canadian Judicial Council, was contacted and asked to correct the fraud on the public record in Canada a matter she refused to do.
Ms. McLachlin was appointed Chief Justice of Canada and Chairperson of the Canadian Judicial Council by Prime Minister Jean Chretien effective January 1, 2000 upon the resignation of Chief Justice Antonio Lamer who retired 11 yers early after he was caught covering up for the other crooked judges in the Water War Crimes saga.
This is the Chairperson of the Canadian Judicial Council
Chief Justice of Canada Beverley McLachlin
The photo to your left is a photo of the Chairperson of the Canadian Judicial Council. The Canadian Judicial Council is made up of the Chief Justices and Associate Chief Justices of the superior courts and courts of appeal of each province and the territories.
The Canadian Judicial Council has a mandate to investigate corrupt practices by member Canadian superior court and appellate court judiciary.
In practice the Council does nothing of the sort and this was especially so in the 1990's and early part of this century when judicial racketeering ran rampant in Canada.
Ms. McLachlin was appointed to the office of the Chief Justice of Canada by Prime Minister Jean Chretien. Ms. McLachlin was close to the notorious Allan McEachern one of the crookedest Chief Justices in the history of British Columbia.
As Chairperson of the Canadian Judicial Council, Ms. McLachlin has neglected her duties and allowed judicial manipulaton and corruption to run rampant in Canada, especially in British Columbia.
The Canadian Judicial Council has a mandate to investigate corrupt practices by member Canadian superior court and appellate court judiciary.
In practice the Council does nothing of the sort and this was especially so in the 1990's and early part of this century when judicial racketeering ran rampant in Canada.
Ms. McLachlin was appointed to the office of the Chief Justice of Canada by Prime Minister Jean Chretien. Ms. McLachlin was close to the notorious Allan McEachern one of the crookedest Chief Justices in the history of British Columbia.
As Chairperson of the Canadian Judicial Council, Ms. McLachlin has neglected her duties and allowed judicial manipulaton and corruption to run rampant in Canada, especially in British Columbia.
Complaints To The Canadian Judicial Council Are Routinely Ignored
Norman Sabourin Chief Executive Officer at CJC
In 1996, Mr. Carten was the victim of a perverse ruling by a justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia that took all of his assets away from him and left him penniless. The judge also made false and defamatory statements in his ruling. The judge, Mr. Robert Edwards, had been the former Deputy Minister of the Attorney General for British Columbia.
At the time, Mr. Carten had no idea that the Ministry of the Attorney General for British Columbia had been involved in major crimes in relation to the Sun Belt Water Inc. lawsuit while Robert Edwards was the man in charge. Like a lamb going to the slaughter, Mr. Carten went to court to try to resolve a difficult family issue thinking that Justice Edwards was an honest judge who would apply the law as it should be applied.
A year later, Mr. Carten learned about the crimes that Robert Edwards had been involved in. He realized then that the decision of Robert Edwards was obviously made to sabotage him because if he proceeded he would uncover the facts that would put Robert Edwards in jail for a very long time .
In early 1998, complaints were filed with the Canadian Judicial Council asking for an investigation of Robert Edwards and instead of carrying out a proper investigation the Canadian Judicial Council carried out protected Robert Edwards who continued on the bench rendering perverted decision after perverted decision and causing much hardship for many Canadian citizens until he was suddenly was heart attacked on November 5, 2007, Guy Fawkes Day, ten days after legal papers were served upon his employer implicating Robert Edwards in the WaterWarCrimes.
Robert Edwards lies dead and rotting in his grave but he should be in jail along with the eight other dead judges and a number of living judges who have not yet paid the price for their treasonous conduct.
If the Canadian Judicial Council had done its job, between 1997 to 2000, and carried out a proper investigation some of these nine would be out on parole now instead of lying in their graves.
At the time, Mr. Carten had no idea that the Ministry of the Attorney General for British Columbia had been involved in major crimes in relation to the Sun Belt Water Inc. lawsuit while Robert Edwards was the man in charge. Like a lamb going to the slaughter, Mr. Carten went to court to try to resolve a difficult family issue thinking that Justice Edwards was an honest judge who would apply the law as it should be applied.
A year later, Mr. Carten learned about the crimes that Robert Edwards had been involved in. He realized then that the decision of Robert Edwards was obviously made to sabotage him because if he proceeded he would uncover the facts that would put Robert Edwards in jail for a very long time .
In early 1998, complaints were filed with the Canadian Judicial Council asking for an investigation of Robert Edwards and instead of carrying out a proper investigation the Canadian Judicial Council carried out protected Robert Edwards who continued on the bench rendering perverted decision after perverted decision and causing much hardship for many Canadian citizens until he was suddenly was heart attacked on November 5, 2007, Guy Fawkes Day, ten days after legal papers were served upon his employer implicating Robert Edwards in the WaterWarCrimes.
Robert Edwards lies dead and rotting in his grave but he should be in jail along with the eight other dead judges and a number of living judges who have not yet paid the price for their treasonous conduct.
If the Canadian Judicial Council had done its job, between 1997 to 2000, and carried out a proper investigation some of these nine would be out on parole now instead of lying in their graves.
Canadian Judicial Council - Its Legislative Mandate
The Canadian Judicial Council is a body created by section 58 of the Judges Act and law passed by the Parliament of Canada. The key sections of the Judges Act are reproduced below.
CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL
Interpretation
Definition of "Minister"
58. In this Part, “Minister” means the Minister of Justice of Canada.
Constitution of the Council
Council established
59. (1) There is hereby established a Council, to be known as the Canadian Judicial Council, consisting of
(a) the Chief Justice of Canada, who shall be the chairman of the Council;
(b) the chief justice and any senior associate chief justice and associate chief justice of each superior court or branch or division thereof;
(c) the senior judges, as defined in subsection 22(3), of the Supreme Court of Yukon, the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories and the Nunavut Court of Justice; and
(d) the Chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada.
(e) [Repealed, 2002, c. 8, s. 104]
(2) and (3) [Repealed, 1999, c. 3, s. 77]
Substitute member
(4) Each member of the Council may appoint a judge of that member's court to be a substitute member of the Council and the substitute member shall act as a member of the Council during any period in which he or she is appointed to act, but the Chief Justice of Canada may, in lieu of appointing a member of the Supreme Court of Canada, appoint any former member of that Court to be a substitute member of the Council.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 59; 1992, c. 51, s. 25; 1996, c. 30, s. 6; 1999, c. 3, s. 77; 2002, c. 7, s. 195, c. 8, s. 104.
Objects of Council
60. (1) The objects of the Council are to promote efficiency and uniformity, and to improve the quality of judicial service, in superior courts.
Powers of Council
(2) In furtherance of its objects, the Council may
(a) establish conferences of chief justices and associate chief justices;
(b) establish seminars for the continuing education of judges;
(c) make the inquiries and the investigation of complaints or allegations described in section 63; and
(d) make the inquiries described in section 69.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 60; 1992, c. 51, s. 26; 2002, c. 8, s. 105.
Meetings of Council
61. (1) The Council shall meet at least once a year.
Work of Council
(2) Subject to this Act, the work of the Council shall be carried on in such manner as the Council may direct.
By-laws
(3) The Council may make by-laws
(a) respecting the calling of meetings of the Council;
(b) respecting the conduct of business at meetings of the Council, including the fixing of quorums for such meetings, the establishment of committees of the Council and the delegation of duties to any such committees; and
(c) respecting the conduct of inquiries and investigations described in section 63.
R.S., c. J-1, s. 30; R.S., c. 16(2nd Supp.), s. 10; 1976-77, c. 25, s. 15.
Employment of counsel and assistants
62. The Council may engage the services of such persons as it deems necessary for carrying out its objects and duties, and also the services of counsel to aid and assist the Council in the conduct of any inquiry or investigation described in section 63.
R.S., c. 16(2nd Supp.), s. 10; 1976-77, c. 25, ss. 15, 16; 1980-81-82-83, c. 157, s. 16.
Inquiries concerning Judges
Inquiries
63. (1) The Council shall, at the request of the Minister or the attorney general of a province, commence an inquiry as to whether a judge of a superior court should be removed from office for any of the reasons set out in paragraphs 65(2)(a) to (d).
Investigations
(2) The Council may investigate any complaint or allegation made in respect of a judge of a superior court.
Inquiry Committee
(3) The Council may, for the purpose of conducting an inquiry or investigation under this section, designate one or more of its members who, together with such members, if any, of the bar of a province, having at least ten years standing, as may be designated by the Minister, shall constitute an Inquiry Committee.
Powers of Council or Inquiry Committee
(4) The Council or an Inquiry Committee in making an inquiry or investigation under this section shall be deemed to be a superior court and shall have
(a) power to summon before it any person or witness and to require him or her to give evidence on oath, orally or in writing or on solemn affirmation if the person or witness is entitled to affirm in civil matters, and to produce such documents and evidence as it deems requisite to the full investigation of the matter into which it is inquiring; and
(b) the same power to enforce the attendance of any person or witness and to compel the person or witness to give evidence as is vested in any superior court of the province in which the inquiry or investigation is being conducted.
Prohibition of information relating to inquiry, etc.
(5) The Council may prohibit the publication of any information or documents placed before it in connection with, or arising out of, an inquiry or investigation under this section when it is of the opinion that the publication is not in the public interest.
Inquiries may be public or private
(6) An inquiry or investigation under this section may be held in public or in private, unless the Minister requires that it be held in public.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 63; 1992, c. 51, s. 27; 2002, c. 8, s. 106.
Notice of hearing
64. A judge in respect of whom an inquiry or investigation under section 63 is to be made shall be given reasonable notice of the subject-matter of the inquiry or investigation and of the time and place of any hearing thereof and shall be afforded an opportunity, in person or by counsel, of being heard at the hearing, of cross-examining witnesses and of adducing evidence on his or her own behalf.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 64; 2002, c. 8, s. 111(E).
Report and Recommendations
Report of Council
65. (1) After an inquiry or investigation under section 63 has been completed, the Council shall report its conclusions and submit the record of the inquiry or investigation to the Minister.
Recommendation to Minister
(2) Where, in the opinion of the Council, the judge in respect of whom an inquiry or investigation has been made has become incapacitated or disabled from the due execution of the office of judge by reason of
(a) age or infirmity,
(b) having been guilty of misconduct,
(c) having failed in the due execution of that office, or
(d) having been placed, by his or her conduct or otherwise, in a position incompatible with the due execution of that office,
the Council, in its report to the Minister under subsection (1), may recommend that the judge be removed from office.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 65; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 5; 2002, c. 8, s. 111(E).
Effect of Inquiry
66. (1) [Repealed, R.S., 1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 6]
Leave of absence with salary
(2) The Governor in Council may grant leave of absence to any judge found, pursuant to subsection 65(2), to be incapacitated or disabled, for such period as the Governor in Council, in view of all the circumstances of the case, may consider just or appropriate, and if leave of absence is granted the salary of the judge shall continue to be paid during the period of leave of absence so granted.
Annuity to judge who resigns
(3) The Governor in Council may grant to any judge found to be incapacitated or disabled, if the judge resigns, the annuity that the Governor in Council might have granted the judge if the judge had resigned at the time when the finding was made by the Governor in Council.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 66; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 6.
67. [Repealed, R.S., 1985, c. 16 (3rd Supp.), s. 5]
68. [Repealed, R.S., 1985, c. 16 (3rd Supp.), s. 6]
Inquiries concerning Other Persons
Further inquiries
69. (1) The Council shall, at the request of the Minister, commence an inquiry to establish whether a person appointed pursuant to an enactment of Parliament to hold office during good behaviour other than
(a) a judge of a superior court, or
(b) a person to whom section 48 of the Parliament of Canada Act applies,
should be removed from office for any of the reasons set out in paragraphs 65(2)(a) to (d).
Applicable provisions
(2) Subsections 63(3) to (6), sections 64 and 65 and subsection 66(2) apply, with such modifications as the circumstances require, to inquiries under this section.
Removal from office
(3) The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Minister, after receipt of a report described in subsection 65(1) in relation to an inquiry under this section in connection with a person who may be removed from office by the Governor in Council other than on an address of the Senate or House of Commons or on a joint address of the Senate and House of Commons, by order, remove the person from office.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 69; 1992, c. 1, s. 144(F), c. 51, s. 28; 1993, c. 34, s. 89; 2002, c. 8, s. 107.
CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL
Interpretation
Definition of "Minister"
58. In this Part, “Minister” means the Minister of Justice of Canada.
Constitution of the Council
Council established
59. (1) There is hereby established a Council, to be known as the Canadian Judicial Council, consisting of
(a) the Chief Justice of Canada, who shall be the chairman of the Council;
(b) the chief justice and any senior associate chief justice and associate chief justice of each superior court or branch or division thereof;
(c) the senior judges, as defined in subsection 22(3), of the Supreme Court of Yukon, the Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories and the Nunavut Court of Justice; and
(d) the Chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada.
(e) [Repealed, 2002, c. 8, s. 104]
(2) and (3) [Repealed, 1999, c. 3, s. 77]
Substitute member
(4) Each member of the Council may appoint a judge of that member's court to be a substitute member of the Council and the substitute member shall act as a member of the Council during any period in which he or she is appointed to act, but the Chief Justice of Canada may, in lieu of appointing a member of the Supreme Court of Canada, appoint any former member of that Court to be a substitute member of the Council.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 59; 1992, c. 51, s. 25; 1996, c. 30, s. 6; 1999, c. 3, s. 77; 2002, c. 7, s. 195, c. 8, s. 104.
Objects of Council
60. (1) The objects of the Council are to promote efficiency and uniformity, and to improve the quality of judicial service, in superior courts.
Powers of Council
(2) In furtherance of its objects, the Council may
(a) establish conferences of chief justices and associate chief justices;
(b) establish seminars for the continuing education of judges;
(c) make the inquiries and the investigation of complaints or allegations described in section 63; and
(d) make the inquiries described in section 69.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 60; 1992, c. 51, s. 26; 2002, c. 8, s. 105.
Meetings of Council
61. (1) The Council shall meet at least once a year.
Work of Council
(2) Subject to this Act, the work of the Council shall be carried on in such manner as the Council may direct.
By-laws
(3) The Council may make by-laws
(a) respecting the calling of meetings of the Council;
(b) respecting the conduct of business at meetings of the Council, including the fixing of quorums for such meetings, the establishment of committees of the Council and the delegation of duties to any such committees; and
(c) respecting the conduct of inquiries and investigations described in section 63.
R.S., c. J-1, s. 30; R.S., c. 16(2nd Supp.), s. 10; 1976-77, c. 25, s. 15.
Employment of counsel and assistants
62. The Council may engage the services of such persons as it deems necessary for carrying out its objects and duties, and also the services of counsel to aid and assist the Council in the conduct of any inquiry or investigation described in section 63.
R.S., c. 16(2nd Supp.), s. 10; 1976-77, c. 25, ss. 15, 16; 1980-81-82-83, c. 157, s. 16.
Inquiries concerning Judges
Inquiries
63. (1) The Council shall, at the request of the Minister or the attorney general of a province, commence an inquiry as to whether a judge of a superior court should be removed from office for any of the reasons set out in paragraphs 65(2)(a) to (d).
Investigations
(2) The Council may investigate any complaint or allegation made in respect of a judge of a superior court.
Inquiry Committee
(3) The Council may, for the purpose of conducting an inquiry or investigation under this section, designate one or more of its members who, together with such members, if any, of the bar of a province, having at least ten years standing, as may be designated by the Minister, shall constitute an Inquiry Committee.
Powers of Council or Inquiry Committee
(4) The Council or an Inquiry Committee in making an inquiry or investigation under this section shall be deemed to be a superior court and shall have
(a) power to summon before it any person or witness and to require him or her to give evidence on oath, orally or in writing or on solemn affirmation if the person or witness is entitled to affirm in civil matters, and to produce such documents and evidence as it deems requisite to the full investigation of the matter into which it is inquiring; and
(b) the same power to enforce the attendance of any person or witness and to compel the person or witness to give evidence as is vested in any superior court of the province in which the inquiry or investigation is being conducted.
Prohibition of information relating to inquiry, etc.
(5) The Council may prohibit the publication of any information or documents placed before it in connection with, or arising out of, an inquiry or investigation under this section when it is of the opinion that the publication is not in the public interest.
Inquiries may be public or private
(6) An inquiry or investigation under this section may be held in public or in private, unless the Minister requires that it be held in public.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 63; 1992, c. 51, s. 27; 2002, c. 8, s. 106.
Notice of hearing
64. A judge in respect of whom an inquiry or investigation under section 63 is to be made shall be given reasonable notice of the subject-matter of the inquiry or investigation and of the time and place of any hearing thereof and shall be afforded an opportunity, in person or by counsel, of being heard at the hearing, of cross-examining witnesses and of adducing evidence on his or her own behalf.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 64; 2002, c. 8, s. 111(E).
Report and Recommendations
Report of Council
65. (1) After an inquiry or investigation under section 63 has been completed, the Council shall report its conclusions and submit the record of the inquiry or investigation to the Minister.
Recommendation to Minister
(2) Where, in the opinion of the Council, the judge in respect of whom an inquiry or investigation has been made has become incapacitated or disabled from the due execution of the office of judge by reason of
(a) age or infirmity,
(b) having been guilty of misconduct,
(c) having failed in the due execution of that office, or
(d) having been placed, by his or her conduct or otherwise, in a position incompatible with the due execution of that office,
the Council, in its report to the Minister under subsection (1), may recommend that the judge be removed from office.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 65; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 5; 2002, c. 8, s. 111(E).
Effect of Inquiry
66. (1) [Repealed, R.S., 1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 6]
Leave of absence with salary
(2) The Governor in Council may grant leave of absence to any judge found, pursuant to subsection 65(2), to be incapacitated or disabled, for such period as the Governor in Council, in view of all the circumstances of the case, may consider just or appropriate, and if leave of absence is granted the salary of the judge shall continue to be paid during the period of leave of absence so granted.
Annuity to judge who resigns
(3) The Governor in Council may grant to any judge found to be incapacitated or disabled, if the judge resigns, the annuity that the Governor in Council might have granted the judge if the judge had resigned at the time when the finding was made by the Governor in Council.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 66; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (2nd Supp.), s. 6.
67. [Repealed, R.S., 1985, c. 16 (3rd Supp.), s. 5]
68. [Repealed, R.S., 1985, c. 16 (3rd Supp.), s. 6]
Inquiries concerning Other Persons
Further inquiries
69. (1) The Council shall, at the request of the Minister, commence an inquiry to establish whether a person appointed pursuant to an enactment of Parliament to hold office during good behaviour other than
(a) a judge of a superior court, or
(b) a person to whom section 48 of the Parliament of Canada Act applies,
should be removed from office for any of the reasons set out in paragraphs 65(2)(a) to (d).
Applicable provisions
(2) Subsections 63(3) to (6), sections 64 and 65 and subsection 66(2) apply, with such modifications as the circumstances require, to inquiries under this section.
Removal from office
(3) The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Minister, after receipt of a report described in subsection 65(1) in relation to an inquiry under this section in connection with a person who may be removed from office by the Governor in Council other than on an address of the Senate or House of Commons or on a joint address of the Senate and House of Commons, by order, remove the person from office.
R.S., 1985, c. J-1, s. 69; 1992, c. 1, s. 144(F), c. 51, s. 28; 1993, c. 34, s. 89; 2002, c. 8, s. 107.
